Which situation is not a cause for indefinite deferral of a donor?

Which situation is not a cause for indefinite deferral of a donor?

• A. Male currently on dutasteride (Avodart)
• B. Donation of a unit of blood that transmitted hepatitis B virus to a recipient
• C. History of Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease
• D. Accidental needle stick 1 year ago; negative for infectious disease

Answer: (D)

Indefinite deferral of a blood donor is typically reserved for situations where there is a significant risk of transmitting infections or negative health implications for the recipient or donor. In assessing the choices provided, one situation stands out as not leading to indefinite deferral. Accidental needle stick incidents that occur outside of the context of a high-risk exposure to blood-borne pathogens generally do not warrant an indefinite deferral, especially if the individual has been tested and cleared of any infectious diseases following the incident. As stated, if the blood donor tested negative for infectious diseases one year after the accidental needle stick, it indicates that there is no ongoing risk associated with that incident. The evaluation focuses not only on the incident itself but also on the subsequent testing results, which affirm the donor's safety for future donations. In contrast, the other situations involve conditions or histories that inherently pose ongoing risks. For example, being on dutasteride is associated with potential effects on donated blood, especially regarding its impact on potential pregnancy in recipients. A past donation resulting in the transmission of hepatitis B virus raises significant safety concerns for future donations. Lastly, a history of Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease carries a strong association with prion disease transmission through blood, leading to indefinite deferral

Indefinite deferral of a blood donor is typically reserved for situations where there is a significant risk of transmitting infections or negative health implications for the recipient or donor. In assessing the choices provided, one situation stands out as not leading to indefinite deferral.

Accidental needle stick incidents that occur outside of the context of a high-risk exposure to blood-borne pathogens generally do not warrant an indefinite deferral, especially if the individual has been tested and cleared of any infectious diseases following the incident. As stated, if the blood donor tested negative for infectious diseases one year after the accidental needle stick, it indicates that there is no ongoing risk associated with that incident. The evaluation focuses not only on the incident itself but also on the subsequent testing results, which affirm the donor's safety for future donations.

In contrast, the other situations involve conditions or histories that inherently pose ongoing risks. For example, being on dutasteride is associated with potential effects on donated blood, especially regarding its impact on potential pregnancy in recipients. A past donation resulting in the transmission of hepatitis B virus raises significant safety concerns for future donations. Lastly, a history of Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease carries a strong association with prion disease transmission through blood, leading to indefinite deferral